“I had no formal training, and everyone at the collegiate level for the most part has been schooled, educated in music at that point. “In retrospect, it was pretty naïve thinking,” Cuchna said. To get the formal education he felt he needed, he enrolled at Sac State. He had pursued music since taking up guitar when he was 13, and twice dropped out of community college to focus on his music career.īy his mid-20s, Cuchna was in a band but souring on the idea of life as a touring musician and feeling that he had reached a limit in what he could teach himself about music. The medium was new when he graduated high school. Podcasting is not something Cuchna ever envisioned himself doing. The show has typically examined hip-hop and R&B artists including Kendrick Lamar, Kanye West, and Beyoncé, though Cuchna has explored music from comedian Bo Burnham and, most recently, alternative rock band Radiohead. Launched in 2016 and since 2018 produced by Spotify, “Dissect” was named the best podcast of 2018 by the New York Times and among the top 50 podcasts that same year by Time magazine and The Guardian. It’s a concept that he says can be traced directly back to his time at Sac State. That love led to an unlikely career: Cuchna is the host of “ Dissect,” a podcast that spends each season analyzing a single album of popular music, song by song, line by line, and note by note. “I really fell in love with the research process.” Cole Cuchna has channeled his Music Theory degree and his love for research into "Dissect," a podcast that analyzes an album of pop music one song at a time. “When you take music history classes, you write a full essay on a Beethoven work or a Shostakovich symphony, and when you do that, you have to research the composer and research what was going on at that time when they wrote this piece of music. “What I fell in love with, unpredictably, was writing about music,” Cuchna said. By that logic, the justices would be immune from federal laws prohibiting bribery-which they are not.When Cole Cuchna ’15 (Theory/Composition) was a Sacramento State student studying music theory, he learned something about himself that would prove life changing. To accept the argument that Congress lacks authority is to put the justices truly above the law. To name just the most directly comparable example, the 1978 Ethics in Government Act has required financial disclosures from judges and justices for decades-and that provision has been upheld in federal court. The notion that Congress can’t regulate ethics on the court ignores a long and uncontroversial history of Congress doing just that. These claims are as dangerous as they are absurd. 6 Trump Trial Still on Track Despite Supreme Court Intervention One Billionaire Made It His Mission to Oust Harvard’s President. The College Presidents’ Antisemitism Failure Is a Bizarre Inversion of What We’re Used to Seeing. In short, according to Leo and the billionaires, being friends with sufficiently powerful officials puts private citizens beyond the reach of congressional investigations. Their excuses run from the baseless claim that Congress can’t regulate Supreme Court ethics to the preposterous argument that Congress can’t investigate people it disagrees with politically.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |